Constructivist Learning Theory, Teaching, and Learning
To understand the relationship between constructivist
learning theories, instructional strategies, and technology tools, there needs
to be a solid comprehension of what these concepts are. The constructivist
learning theory states that students are active builders of knowledge (Orey,
2001). In a sense, the child does not get a concept, but they create it. In
order for them to do this, the teacher must use instructional strategies that
are highly effective. Higher order thinking questions and graphic organizers
are a couple of instructional strategies that can be differentiated to meet the
needs of all students. These concepts can help a student construct their
learning and allow them to make connections to retain information. In addition
to using instructional strategies that allow each child to construct their
learning, incorporating technology tools will also strengthen a child's ability
to construct their learning. For example, using PowerPoint is an amazing tool
that allows the child to build their learning (Laureate Education, 2015e).
Using PowerPoint and math is a great way to allow the constructionism theory to
work. According to the constructivist
approach, students should be given the opportunity to discover and construct
their own mathematical meanings. It follows that teachers should play the role
of facilitator, refraining from providing direct instruction or telling
students anything that they might be able to discover for themselves (Allene,
2011).
In the near future, I plan to use constructivist based
instructional strategies in my classroom. Knowing the benefits that it has on
student achievement is motivation to utilize these tools to help my students be
successful. it is imperative for educators in democratic societies to remove
the barriers for a more humanistic, emancipatory and intelligent education
(Bently & Fleury, 2017). The barriers in this case are, on part, the teacher.
As an educator, we cannot stifle the learning opportunities of our students,
which includes limiting their thinking capacity. Our job is to open the door
for them, not tell them what path to take once they go through it, as long as
they end up at the same destination. I currently use a couple of web 2.0 tools
to reinforce any concepts being taught. The students are able to work at a pace
best suited for them. This falls in line with ISTE Standard #3 for Students
which states students critically curate a variety of resources using digital
tools to construct knowledge, produce creative artifacts and make meaningful
learning experiences for themselves and others (2016). This is the basis of the
constructivist theory. The ISTE Standard #1 for Teachers state that teachers
use their knowledge of subject matter, teaching and learning, and technology to
facilitate experiences that advance student learning, creativity, and
innovation in both face to face and virtual environment (2008).
The application that I researched was from NASA's
interactive module on the solar system. Now, for GH, I can make the solar
system the main idea for the learning. Students will focus on this one topic
and explore using simulated website from NASA. With the idea of constructivism
in mind, the students will be able to make their own connections to the planets
and their experience would be a bit more meaningful. Students who are given the
opportunity to create their learning will remember the opportunity and it will
stick in their brains for the long run.
References
Allen, K.
(2011). Mathematics as Thinking. Democracy & Education, 19(2), 1-7.
Bentley, M. L.,
& Fleury, S. C. (2017). 21st Century Science Education: A Critical-Creative
Social Constructivist Perspective. Critical Education, 8(11), 1-15.
International
Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (2016). Standards for students.
Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/standards/standards/for-students-2016
International
Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (2008). Standards for teachers.
Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/standards/standards/standards-for-teachers
Laureate
Education (Producer). (2015e). Constructionist and constructivist learning
theories [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Orey,
M. (Ed.). (2001). Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology.
Retrieved from http://epltt.coe.uga.edu/index.php?title=Main_Page
Comments
Post a Comment